Atom Feed
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
Advertisements
Great HD Links
- HD For Indies Home Page
- HD For Indies FAQ
- HD 24
- Cinematography
- Bare Feats
- 24p Entertainment
- Light Illusion (was Digital Praxis)
- OneRiver Codec Resource
- CamcorderInfo.com
- LumiereHD
- HighDef.org Info
- Understanding RAID
- Video Systems (Reviews)
- DV Film (DV=>Film)
- SonyHDVInfo.com
- Plus 8 Digital (vendor)
- Digital Cinema Society
- Texas High Def (local F900 guy)
- Creative Cow (news & forums)
- Philadelphia FCP User Group
- Los Angeles FCP User Group
- Cinema Tech
- FresHDV
- DV Info's forums
- HVX User
- Pro App Tips
- Bluesky Media - Instruction
- RedUser.net
- fxguide
- little frog in high def
- VideoMaker Learning Section
- Stu Maschwitz's ProLost
Archives
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- March 2009
High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers
A How To Guide for Digital Filmmakers
Welcome all! This is my blog to share my latest research,
thoughts, etc. on utilizing HD for independent filmmaking.
YES, I am available for consulting
Contact me at mike@hdforindies.com
All content copyright 2004-2007 Mike Curtis.
Monday, November 21, 2005
Latest Info on the HVX200 - 1080 res progressive CCDs?
UPDATED SUNDAY NIGHT AD THEN AGAIN MONDAY MORNING- SEE BOTTOM

Camcorderinfo.com Message Board - Latest Info on the HVX200, although DVInfo.net had it about two days before here, or really even here on the 15th, I just didn't find it that way first (thanks to sharp readers for pointing out the timeline for who should get the original credit).
The above text chart was snaggged from the Panasonic Japan page on HVX200, and is not of my own creation - it is theirs. Credit where credit due, etc.
Worth noting is that it will definitely do regular 3:2 pulldown as well as Advanced Pulldown mode for a variety of formats.
According to the Panasonic Japan website on the HVX200:
-1080 line, progressive CCDs - this is different from what I assumed by a longshot, I've been assuming they'd use 720p imager and uprez so as not to numerically upstage their much more expensive Varicam $65,000 720p camera (even though Varicam has beeter glass, pro outputs, etc.).
-720 and 480 res footage will be downsampled from this larger imager - Graeme, thoughts on contrast and detail in that context?
-Analog to Digital signal processor (A/D DSP) is 14 bits with an internal precision of 19 bit
-variable frame rates (for fast/slow motion through over/under cranking) is only available in 720p (but could you use built in downconversion to copy over FireWire as DV downconvert or somesuch?) adjustable in 11 steps from 12 to 60 fps (drat, hoping for slower, but can do that in post I suppose)
-Variable frame rate has to be recorded to P2 or external disk
-Yeah, HD can be downsampled from P2 to internal DV cassette (nice!)
-variable slow shutter down to 1/12th second
-Cinegamma - 8 gamma modes (choice is good), including news
-link to Babelfish translated version of Japanese page
Bear in mind this is all someone's interpretation of the Japanese site's translation, so could be wrong. I'm just reporting what Camcorderinfo.com reported with some commentary thrown in.
I'll believe it when it is clearly stated, in English (not badly mistranslated Engrish) what the true native resolution of the CCDs is.
Thanks to Matthwe Jeppsen from FresHDV for sending me the link!
-mike
I emailed Graeme Nattress of Nattress Plugins, and he responded:
Hi Mike,
Ah, but Jan on the cow (CreativeCow.net - mike)said it uses both horizontal and vertical pixel shift. This would make it a not 1080p imager. I'm guessing:
960x720 chips, approx with h and v pixelshift
pixelshift gives about a 1.4 factor rez so...
that gives you your 1280x1080 progressive.
Now that is now sampled down to 720p which is 960x720, or to 1080i or etc....
-Graeme
the saga continues,
-mike
UPDATE
From this forum on Creative Cow from Jan, The Woman Herself from Panasonic:
The camera starts with a progressive chip, a 1080/60P chip. In its 24P or 30P modes, or its variable frame modes, it will change to that time base for capture, but it starts as a progressive chip capture and then makes the conversion, cross conversion or down conversion from there. It is a true progressive chip set and will make progressive pictures, not marketing, but rather, engineering.
Hope this helps,
Jan
Jan Crittenden Livingston
Product Manager, DVCPRO, DVCPRO50, AG-DVX100
Panasonic Broadcast & TV Systems
...however, this still doesn't answer the "true resolution" question.
But she previously said:
But then you do nothave to be disappointed because it does use horizontal and vertical spatial offset.
here, so to me that reinforces the circa 960x720ish resolution, and the pixelshift/spatial offset will generate the 1280x1080 for 1080 res DVCPRO HD.
A big THANK YOU to readers for pointing out links to all these tidbits in the comments section, I wouldn't have found'em without you. Working together, we can get some good answers, so I VERY much appreciate your time and contribution.
Somebody in one of the forums claims the native res will be 1280x720 which is DVCPRO HD so therefore I am wrong...but the PLAYBACK res is 1280x720, internally it is only 960x720, literally just twice DV res.
Bottom line - I'm still thinking 960x720 "true" native, with pixel shift it'll give a nice 4:2:2 1080p res. Larger pixels on the sensor are actually a good thing, since it gives better contrast and better signal/noise to my understanding. The Z1U uses 960x1080 as a 1080i camera, Jan has stated that there will be both horizontal and vertical spatial offset, so that might support 960x720.
But of course, this is all my own speculation, and IANAE (I Am Not An Engineer).
The REAL issue is how good does the footage look when the camera is in YOUR hands (or your DoP's) on your set shooting your movie/project.
Graeme posted this in the comments, I thought it worthy of inclusion:
Pixelshift is not upsampling. It's real rez you get, and you get lower noise / better dynamic range benefits too. Indeed, you'll end up with a better, contrastier picture this way.
Other affordable HD cameras might have "resolution" but they don't have "definition", and certainly not "high definition" in the way that say, a varicam or HDCAM image just pops off the screen (and that's before post production).
Panasonic really seem to be doing the engineering right on this one, from all we've heard. But the proof is in the pudding, and that's just about baked.
-mike

Camcorderinfo.com Message Board - Latest Info on the HVX200, although DVInfo.net had it about two days before here, or really even here on the 15th, I just didn't find it that way first (thanks to sharp readers for pointing out the timeline for who should get the original credit).
The above text chart was snaggged from the Panasonic Japan page on HVX200, and is not of my own creation - it is theirs. Credit where credit due, etc.
Worth noting is that it will definitely do regular 3:2 pulldown as well as Advanced Pulldown mode for a variety of formats.
According to the Panasonic Japan website on the HVX200:
-1080 line, progressive CCDs - this is different from what I assumed by a longshot, I've been assuming they'd use 720p imager and uprez so as not to numerically upstage their much more expensive Varicam $65,000 720p camera (even though Varicam has beeter glass, pro outputs, etc.).
-720 and 480 res footage will be downsampled from this larger imager - Graeme, thoughts on contrast and detail in that context?
-Analog to Digital signal processor (A/D DSP) is 14 bits with an internal precision of 19 bit
-variable frame rates (for fast/slow motion through over/under cranking) is only available in 720p (but could you use built in downconversion to copy over FireWire as DV downconvert or somesuch?) adjustable in 11 steps from 12 to 60 fps (drat, hoping for slower, but can do that in post I suppose)
-Variable frame rate has to be recorded to P2 or external disk
-Yeah, HD can be downsampled from P2 to internal DV cassette (nice!)
-variable slow shutter down to 1/12th second
-Cinegamma - 8 gamma modes (choice is good), including news
-link to Babelfish translated version of Japanese page
Bear in mind this is all someone's interpretation of the Japanese site's translation, so could be wrong. I'm just reporting what Camcorderinfo.com reported with some commentary thrown in.
I'll believe it when it is clearly stated, in English (not badly mistranslated Engrish) what the true native resolution of the CCDs is.
Thanks to Matthwe Jeppsen from FresHDV for sending me the link!
-mike
I emailed Graeme Nattress of Nattress Plugins, and he responded:
Hi Mike,
Ah, but Jan on the cow (CreativeCow.net - mike)said it uses both horizontal and vertical pixel shift. This would make it a not 1080p imager. I'm guessing:
960x720 chips, approx with h and v pixelshift
pixelshift gives about a 1.4 factor rez so...
that gives you your 1280x1080 progressive.
Now that is now sampled down to 720p which is 960x720, or to 1080i or etc....
-Graeme
the saga continues,
-mike
UPDATE
From this forum on Creative Cow from Jan, The Woman Herself from Panasonic:
The camera starts with a progressive chip, a 1080/60P chip. In its 24P or 30P modes, or its variable frame modes, it will change to that time base for capture, but it starts as a progressive chip capture and then makes the conversion, cross conversion or down conversion from there. It is a true progressive chip set and will make progressive pictures, not marketing, but rather, engineering.
Hope this helps,
Jan
Jan Crittenden Livingston
Product Manager, DVCPRO, DVCPRO50, AG-DVX100
Panasonic Broadcast & TV Systems
...however, this still doesn't answer the "true resolution" question.
But she previously said:
But then you do nothave to be disappointed because it does use horizontal and vertical spatial offset.
here, so to me that reinforces the circa 960x720ish resolution, and the pixelshift/spatial offset will generate the 1280x1080 for 1080 res DVCPRO HD.
A big THANK YOU to readers for pointing out links to all these tidbits in the comments section, I wouldn't have found'em without you. Working together, we can get some good answers, so I VERY much appreciate your time and contribution.
Somebody in one of the forums claims the native res will be 1280x720 which is DVCPRO HD so therefore I am wrong...but the PLAYBACK res is 1280x720, internally it is only 960x720, literally just twice DV res.
Bottom line - I'm still thinking 960x720 "true" native, with pixel shift it'll give a nice 4:2:2 1080p res. Larger pixels on the sensor are actually a good thing, since it gives better contrast and better signal/noise to my understanding. The Z1U uses 960x1080 as a 1080i camera, Jan has stated that there will be both horizontal and vertical spatial offset, so that might support 960x720.
But of course, this is all my own speculation, and IANAE (I Am Not An Engineer).
The REAL issue is how good does the footage look when the camera is in YOUR hands (or your DoP's) on your set shooting your movie/project.
Graeme posted this in the comments, I thought it worthy of inclusion:
Pixelshift is not upsampling. It's real rez you get, and you get lower noise / better dynamic range benefits too. Indeed, you'll end up with a better, contrastier picture this way.
Other affordable HD cameras might have "resolution" but they don't have "definition", and certainly not "high definition" in the way that say, a varicam or HDCAM image just pops off the screen (and that's before post production).
Panasonic really seem to be doing the engineering right on this one, from all we've heard. But the proof is in the pudding, and that's just about baked.
-mike
Comments:
Here's the link to Jan's comments, if anyone is interested.
http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856029
http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856029
This camera sounds pretty amazing so far, and I'm really curious if it will prove to be better solution than the Canon model due to being able to avoid the compression artifacts of recording to HDV.
Does anyone know if these cameras will all be at DVExpo in LA? I'm planning on going out there, and I hope I can get my hands on one in person.
Does anyone know if these cameras will all be at DVExpo in LA? I'm planning on going out there, and I hope I can get my hands on one in person.
You can see @
http://www.dvxuser.com/V3/showthread.php?p=349360#post349360
this discussion and a mention regarding your blog and updated info like http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856033.
What do you have to say, Mike?
Thanks in advance,
Emanuel
http://www.dvxuser.com/V3/showthread.php?p=349360#post349360
this discussion and a mention regarding your blog and updated info like http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856033.
What do you have to say, Mike?
Thanks in advance,
Emanuel
I spoke with an engineer at HD Expo, the chips are native 720p, and the 1080 mode is simply upsampling. This is the same reason why the HD XL camera is 1080i, native 1080p chips are too expensive to put into a prosumer camera. Variable framerate 720p is still pretty impressive at $6k.
This from Jan about an hour ago:
"The signal that is captured from the CCD is a 1080P signal. The CCD is an analog device. There is not a line for line readout in any CCD camera. The CCDs on the HVX200 are not 1080 X 1920, the performance in low light would be unacceptavble. However the output is captured at 1920X1080 and then is converted to the format that is needed, like 1080i or 720P or SD. The 1080P signal only gets recorded in the 2 1080P progressive formats of 24P and 30P and these are segmented frames in a respective pulldown to 1080i. All of this happens before compression and subsampling to bring the signal to DVCPRO HD."
http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856037
"The signal that is captured from the CCD is a 1080P signal. The CCD is an analog device. There is not a line for line readout in any CCD camera. The CCDs on the HVX200 are not 1080 X 1920, the performance in low light would be unacceptavble. However the output is captured at 1920X1080 and then is converted to the format that is needed, like 1080i or 720P or SD. The 1080P signal only gets recorded in the 2 1080P progressive formats of 24P and 30P and these are segmented frames in a respective pulldown to 1080i. All of this happens before compression and subsampling to bring the signal to DVCPRO HD."
http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/new_read_post.cgi?forumid=193&postid=856037
Thanks for crediting DV Info Net with this, but actually DVX User had the story a full 24 hours before we did (which is business as usual for DVX User). The original discussion about this new HVX200 info can be found on DVX User at http://www.dvxuser.com/V3/showthread.php?t=38733 -- just giving "credit where credit is due," as mentioned previously.
Chris Hurd
DV Info Net
San Marcos, TX
www.dvinfo.net
Chris Hurd
DV Info Net
San Marcos, TX
www.dvinfo.net
Pixelshift is not upsampling. It's real rez you get, and you get lower noise / better dynamic range benefits too. Indeed, you'll end up with a better, contrastier picture this way.
Other affordable HD cameras might have "resolution" but they don't have "definition", and certainly not "high definition" in the way that say, a varicam or HDCAM image just pops off the screen (and that's before post production).
Panasonic really seem to be doing the engineering right on this one, from all we've heard. But the proof is in the pudding, and that's just about baked.
Other affordable HD cameras might have "resolution" but they don't have "definition", and certainly not "high definition" in the way that say, a varicam or HDCAM image just pops off the screen (and that's before post production).
Panasonic really seem to be doing the engineering right on this one, from all we've heard. But the proof is in the pudding, and that's just about baked.
I may be missing something but in the list of pixel formats there is no 1920x1080 but lots of talk of 1280x1080 which isn't even 16x9. Have I misread the formats? Doesn't 1080 refer to 1920x1080?
Dale - DVCPRO HD stores 1080 resolution footage internally as 1280x1080 (or 1440x1080 for PAL, but we aren't expecting that here), even though on playback it comes out as 1920x1080. 1280x720 playback is recorded at 960x720 and scaled up on playback via software in QT.
Hi, HVH200 starts with an analog signal that is sampled in order to feed the DVCPRO format which is:
60p and variable rates: 1280x720 with 3/4 resampling to 960x720 4:2:2 cosited
30p: 1920x1080 2/3 resampling to 1280x1080 4:2:2 cosited
25p: 1920x1080 3/4 resampling to 1440x1080 4:2:2 cosited
DVCPRO50 pal: 3,3:1 compression 720x576 4:2:2 cosited (360x576 color differences)
DVCPRO25 pal: 5:1 comrpession 720x576 4:1:1 not cosited (180x567 color differences)
normal DV pal: 5:1 compression 720x576 4:2:0 cosited (360x288 color differences blocky!)
normal DV ntsc is 5:1 compression 720x480 4:1:1 not cosited (180x480 color differences)
The 30p and 25p frame rates use the full DVCPROHD 100mbit/sec bandwidth. The 720p with 60p (or variable) rates uses a part of it. All of it for 60p but only a fraction for 24p and others. The smaller rate will also be recorded to firestore etc. This makes 1080p 30p and 25p the best quality modes for this camera.
On playback DVCPROHD upsamples 4/3 or 3/2 to output the "original" resolution that complies with the HD specs.
Any CCD can produce the 1920x1080 signal just like any sax player can be recorded on any analog to digital converter. Perhaps the recording is at higher rate than is needed. But you can still record it. The point of sampling at such high frequencies is to use the dhvprohd scheme.
Hope this helps a little!
Post a Comment
60p and variable rates: 1280x720 with 3/4 resampling to 960x720 4:2:2 cosited
30p: 1920x1080 2/3 resampling to 1280x1080 4:2:2 cosited
25p: 1920x1080 3/4 resampling to 1440x1080 4:2:2 cosited
DVCPRO50 pal: 3,3:1 compression 720x576 4:2:2 cosited (360x576 color differences)
DVCPRO25 pal: 5:1 comrpession 720x576 4:1:1 not cosited (180x567 color differences)
normal DV pal: 5:1 compression 720x576 4:2:0 cosited (360x288 color differences blocky!)
normal DV ntsc is 5:1 compression 720x480 4:1:1 not cosited (180x480 color differences)
The 30p and 25p frame rates use the full DVCPROHD 100mbit/sec bandwidth. The 720p with 60p (or variable) rates uses a part of it. All of it for 60p but only a fraction for 24p and others. The smaller rate will also be recorded to firestore etc. This makes 1080p 30p and 25p the best quality modes for this camera.
On playback DVCPROHD upsamples 4/3 or 3/2 to output the "original" resolution that complies with the HD specs.
Any CCD can produce the 1920x1080 signal just like any sax player can be recorded on any analog to digital converter. Perhaps the recording is at higher rate than is needed. But you can still record it. The point of sampling at such high frequencies is to use the dhvprohd scheme.
Hope this helps a little!
Links to this post:

