Atom Feed
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
Advertisements
Great HD Links
- HD For Indies Home Page
- HD For Indies FAQ
- HD 24
- Cinematography
- Bare Feats
- 24p Entertainment
- Digital Praxis
- OneRiver Codec Resource
- CamcorderInfo.com
- LumiereHD
- HighDef.org Info
- Understanding RAID
- Video Systems (Reviews)
- DV Film (DV=>Film)
- SonyHDVInfo.com
- Plus 8 Digital (vendor)
- Digital Cinema Society
- Texas High Def (local F900 guy)
- Creative Cow (news & forums)
- Philadelphia FCP User Group
- Los Angeles FCP User Group
- Cinema Tech
- FresHDV
- DV Info's forums
- HVX User
- Pro App Tips
- Bluesky Media - Instruction
- RedUser.net
- fxguide
- little frog in high def
- VideoMaker Learning Section
- Stu Maschwitz's ProLost
Archives
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers
A How To Guide for Digital Filmmakers
Welcome all! This is my blog to share my latest research,
thoughts, etc. on utilizing HD for independent filmmaking.
YES, I am available for consulting
Contact me at mike@hdforindies.com
All content copyright 2004-2007 Mike Curtis.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Mike's Thoughts on the Theory Behind the Red One Camera
Theory of RED
The proposed specs on the Red camera are all very exciting, and it should be very interesting to see how it all plays out.
But one thing I want to come back to is WHY this camera exists, and what it is trying to do.
One of the first conversations I had with someone about this project involved dicsussion of film vs. video. Disregarding all the quality differences, it was a discussion of the two completely different approaches that the two types of products were produced with.
Film cameras were really about buying a body, and putting different lenses on the front and different media (film stocks) on the back.
But with video cameras, it is very, very different. If you buy a nice enough video camera, you can swap out lenses on the front end. And that is a very good thing. But what you can't do is swap out media on the back end. The closest thing you can do to it is plug different decks into the back of it, but that is an incredibly limiting choice - you're tethered to that huge blob to capture it's data, which is itself tethered more often than not to an AC power outlet.
If you want to record to a different media and still be mobile, you have to go out and buy an ENTIRELY NEW CAMERA. I'm not aware of film stocks that come out that you have to buy a whole new camera for as long as it is still the same basic format - 16mm vs 35mm, Super or not.
One of the goals of Red, in my opinion, is to be closer to the film camera kind of model - you buy a camera body with a lot of capabilities, but you can put different lenses on the front and put different recording media on the back. You can buy new lenses or recording media to suit the needs of your project.
Need 720p or 1080p or 1080i or 2K? You can do that now with the built in recording to RED-DRIVE.
Don't want to subject it to heavy g-loadings for fear of crashing the heads? Use REDFLASH.
Want uncompressed RAW? Use REDRAID. Need RAW and to be untethered? Use REDRAM.
"Well gee, what if something better than REDRAID comes out?" - there's a high speed port on the back of the camera that will connect to the REDRAID. At this time, they are talking about using something like Infiniband of multi-link fiber channel on an adaptor to go to the REDRAID. But since it is a port, it's possible that if some GooglePlug comes out in a couple of years, you could use that to connect to some new kind of storage technology.
Want a new image sensor? It is upgradeable.
Want to record to something else or new that comes out? The camera has built in HD-SDI single and dual link, 4:2:2, 4:4:4, even 4:4:4 RGB log output. Plug into these industry standard taps and away you go.
-mike
The proposed specs on the Red camera are all very exciting, and it should be very interesting to see how it all plays out.
But one thing I want to come back to is WHY this camera exists, and what it is trying to do.
One of the first conversations I had with someone about this project involved dicsussion of film vs. video. Disregarding all the quality differences, it was a discussion of the two completely different approaches that the two types of products were produced with.
Film cameras were really about buying a body, and putting different lenses on the front and different media (film stocks) on the back.
But with video cameras, it is very, very different. If you buy a nice enough video camera, you can swap out lenses on the front end. And that is a very good thing. But what you can't do is swap out media on the back end. The closest thing you can do to it is plug different decks into the back of it, but that is an incredibly limiting choice - you're tethered to that huge blob to capture it's data, which is itself tethered more often than not to an AC power outlet.
If you want to record to a different media and still be mobile, you have to go out and buy an ENTIRELY NEW CAMERA. I'm not aware of film stocks that come out that you have to buy a whole new camera for as long as it is still the same basic format - 16mm vs 35mm, Super or not.
One of the goals of Red, in my opinion, is to be closer to the film camera kind of model - you buy a camera body with a lot of capabilities, but you can put different lenses on the front and put different recording media on the back. You can buy new lenses or recording media to suit the needs of your project.
Need 720p or 1080p or 1080i or 2K? You can do that now with the built in recording to RED-DRIVE.
Don't want to subject it to heavy g-loadings for fear of crashing the heads? Use REDFLASH.
Want uncompressed RAW? Use REDRAID. Need RAW and to be untethered? Use REDRAM.
"Well gee, what if something better than REDRAID comes out?" - there's a high speed port on the back of the camera that will connect to the REDRAID. At this time, they are talking about using something like Infiniband of multi-link fiber channel on an adaptor to go to the REDRAID. But since it is a port, it's possible that if some GooglePlug comes out in a couple of years, you could use that to connect to some new kind of storage technology.
Want a new image sensor? It is upgradeable.
Want to record to something else or new that comes out? The camera has built in HD-SDI single and dual link, 4:2:2, 4:4:4, even 4:4:4 RGB log output. Plug into these industry standard taps and away you go.
-mike
Labels: Red
Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post: