Atom Feed
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
Advertisements
Great HD Links
- HD For Indies Home Page
- HD For Indies FAQ
- HD 24
- Cinematography
- Bare Feats
- 24p Entertainment
- Digital Praxis
- OneRiver Codec Resource
- CamcorderInfo.com
- LumiereHD
- HighDef.org Info
- Understanding RAID
- Video Systems (Reviews)
- DV Film (DV=>Film)
- SonyHDVInfo.com
- Plus 8 Digital (vendor)
- Digital Cinema Society
- Texas High Def (local F900 guy)
- Creative Cow (news & forums)
- Philadelphia FCP User Group
- Los Angeles FCP User Group
- Cinema Tech
- FresHDV
- DV Info's forums
- HVX User
- Pro App Tips
- Bluesky Media - Instruction
- RedUser.net
- fxguide
- little frog in high def
- VideoMaker Learning Section
- Stu Maschwitz's ProLost
Archives
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers
A How To Guide for Digital Filmmakers
Welcome all! This is my blog to share my latest research,
thoughts, etc. on utilizing HD for independent filmmaking.
YES, I am available for consulting
Contact me at mike@hdforindies.com
All content copyright 2004-2007 Mike Curtis.
Friday, August 11, 2006
Making an Indie HDV Feature Without Making Big Mistakes
Studio Daily | Technique | Case Studies
My friend Frederic Haubrich (met him as developer of LumiereHD HDV app) directed a movie, and it is on the front page of Studio Daily today.
Rock on Frederic! His shot on HDV film, Tomorrow is Today, is a great case study of how to do HDV RIGHT. They shot on Sony Z1U at 50i (best camera choice available at time for budget), with a good DoP, careful post, and the results are good. Read on for good tips on how to shoot and post HDV properly for good results.
-mike
Comments:
Hi Mike,
What is the best way to get HDV to 4:4:4 for compositing. What about taking the HD component output to an array...
What is the best way to get HDV to 4:4:4 for compositing. What about taking the HD component output to an array...
It's good to know i'm not the only one awake. Only I'm at work... gotta finish this project... ben from Chicago
I shot a TV show last year for about 3 months and went through about 6 of these cameras.
We were using the North American Versions. And there was another DP on the shoot.
The article is totally right on shooting avoiding under exposed images. IT's pretty bad at keep detail in the dark areas.
My memory is a little foggy at the moment, but I remember the other DP, and myself (a dp too) did a slew of tests. We didn't like the Cineframe mode at all, and only used the cine colour settings.
Another major issue was whenever we had the camera at 50i mode. The backfocus would be way off. Nothing stayed in focus from one from focal length to another. It didn't make sense to either of us.
So, we just stuck with 60i, with Cine Colour. Some shots came out very nice, and a lot didn't. Producers left the colour corrections to the editors. OH well.
That being said, the colour correction is pretty good from the trailer. The exterior shots look good.
We were using the North American Versions. And there was another DP on the shoot.
The article is totally right on shooting avoiding under exposed images. IT's pretty bad at keep detail in the dark areas.
My memory is a little foggy at the moment, but I remember the other DP, and myself (a dp too) did a slew of tests. We didn't like the Cineframe mode at all, and only used the cine colour settings.
Another major issue was whenever we had the camera at 50i mode. The backfocus would be way off. Nothing stayed in focus from one from focal length to another. It didn't make sense to either of us.
So, we just stuck with 60i, with Cine Colour. Some shots came out very nice, and a lot didn't. Producers left the colour corrections to the editors. OH well.
That being said, the colour correction is pretty good from the trailer. The exterior shots look good.
Dear TM... about 4:4:4 compositing (assuming AE, Shake, etc)...
1. as long as you render to a lossless codec, you are working in 4:4:4.
2. you might want to run Magic Bullet or Nattress' G-Nicer or some kind of median or blur on the chroma of the footage as a preprocess stage. This will result in better compositing results downstream.
3. Consider your interlacing / de-interlacing options carefully.
If you have more questions, pay Mike to consult! If you go down the wrong path with compositing, you can waste tons of time. Mike will easily pay for himself in time and frustration he saves you.
Bruce
1. as long as you render to a lossless codec, you are working in 4:4:4.
2. you might want to run Magic Bullet or Nattress' G-Nicer or some kind of median or blur on the chroma of the footage as a preprocess stage. This will result in better compositing results downstream.
3. Consider your interlacing / de-interlacing options carefully.
If you have more questions, pay Mike to consult! If you go down the wrong path with compositing, you can waste tons of time. Mike will easily pay for himself in time and frustration he saves you.
Bruce
TM
Do you want to get it to 4:4:4 just for chroma keying or for any other effects? As Bruce said Nattress has a filter that will pre-process the footage and actually cleans up the alpha to give you more info in the color channels.
Having said that I use the Serious Ultra keyer which is quite amazing. I use it on DV and HDV without having to pre-process at all and get great results. I bet it'd be even better with Nattress filtering before hand.
I thought I heard somewhere that there was some combination of scaling the clip down and filtering that can convert HDV to 4:4:4 but not sure if that is true or not.
Do you want to get it to 4:4:4 just for chroma keying or for any other effects? As Bruce said Nattress has a filter that will pre-process the footage and actually cleans up the alpha to give you more info in the color channels.
Having said that I use the Serious Ultra keyer which is quite amazing. I use it on DV and HDV without having to pre-process at all and get great results. I bet it'd be even better with Nattress filtering before hand.
I thought I heard somewhere that there was some combination of scaling the clip down and filtering that can convert HDV to 4:4:4 but not sure if that is true or not.
Wes - if you scale HDV down to SD resolution with a proper tool (After Effects, combustion, Shake, etc.) and write it out with 4:4:4 codec, you've increased the color resolution. What was 4:2:0 at 1440x1080 would not be shrunk to 720x480. If the chroma was low res at high res source, shrinking increases the chroma sampling per pixel at the small size. Chug the math and you'll see what I mean (I hope).
Post a Comment
Links to this post:

