Atom Feed
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
Advertisements
Great HD Links
- HD For Indies Home Page
- HD For Indies FAQ
- HD 24
- Cinematography
- Bare Feats
- 24p Entertainment
- Digital Praxis
- OneRiver Codec Resource
- CamcorderInfo.com
- LumiereHD
- HighDef.org Info
- Understanding RAID
- Video Systems (Reviews)
- DV Film (DV=>Film)
- SonyHDVInfo.com
- Plus 8 Digital (vendor)
- Digital Cinema Society
- Texas High Def (local F900 guy)
- Creative Cow (news & forums)
- Philadelphia FCP User Group
- Los Angeles FCP User Group
- Cinema Tech
- FresHDV
- DV Info's forums
- HVX User
- Pro App Tips
- Bluesky Media - Instruction
- RedUser.net
- fxguide
- little frog in high def
- VideoMaker Learning Section
- Stu Maschwitz's ProLost
Archives
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers
A How To Guide for Digital Filmmakers
Welcome all! This is my blog to share my latest research,
thoughts, etc. on utilizing HD for independent filmmaking.
YES, I am available for consulting
Contact me at mike@hdforindies.com
All content copyright 2004-2007 Mike Curtis.
Saturday, March 17, 2007
Red Pricing & News Analysis, Part 2
Overall let me summarize:
before we start, here's my first impressions from the other day with more details on the new accessories)
I'm happy with how low the prices are on all the Red accessories - as professional level gear, this stuff is VERY inexpensive.
There's even been an improvement - the battery charger is only $550, not $750 - Jim says it was a pricing mistake. Post-announcement correction, misquoted price, "whatevs" - a welcome change.
UPDATE - but then the Red Arm & extension cables were removed from the LCD - compare the original (Google cached) to the current one. So that's a further $375 reduction in value to the customer. The specs do keep changing.
I originally misunderstood the purpose of the CF Flash module - I thought it was for settings and stills, pulled out and made optional. But that's the SD module, not the CF module, and the SD module IS included with the camera. That, on top of the lack of included battery, LCD, and what I understood to be Red Flash made me think that the price point was held by stripping off parts and making them cost added options, and that made me cranky.
I was then further dissapointed that the "extra love" we'd been hearing noises about was basically just going to get us back to where our expectations started.
I think this boils down to the following good news/bad news scenario:
GOOD NEWS: The camera is everything promised, and more. You get 4K compressed recording onboard, which didn't exist when the original $17.5K price point was announced. As for Red Flash, there's now three kinds, take your pick. You get get your Redcine for free, for now an open license for your own use on as many machines as you want. Instead of a 3.5" flip-out LCD, you get a 5.6" 1024x600 one that can mount anywhere on the camera. Instead of a small embedded/internal battery, you get a full size professional one. As a reservation holder, you get a $2500 credit to pick the accessories of your choice.
BAD NEWS: Battery not included (but is bigger/better than originally planned). LCD not included (but again, bigger/better than originally planned). Red Flash module not included (but there's three or four to choose from). That $2500 roughly catches you up to where you thought you were starting - so instead of a bonus prize, you get what you thought you were already getting. Flippantly, let me say its exciting in the same way a tax refund is - "Hooray! I got my own...money..back. Hmm."
In retrospect, it is a little more complicated than "So did we get the camera promised at the same price point or didn't we?" - I think the exact answer is now "You get more camera than was originally proposed at that $17,500 price point, with more features and better options than originally proposed. But it is taking a little longer, early units will not be feature complete for a few months yet, and the price has effectively gone up a bit. BUT, if you're a reservation holder, you're going to pretty much get what you expected for the same size check."
I think the discrepancy arose when we'd expected camera/battery/LCD and THEN some extra goodies on top of that for being reservation holders. Instead, we got camera/battery/LCD. I'd mentally incorporated all the improvements in features and expected the price point to remain exactly the same.
It has taken some time to digest all this news and come up with a cogent analysis.
I still love the camera and think it is Sliced Bread 2.0 as far as cameras go in terms of what I'd want, delivering far more features than I could expect from any other company at this price point - to the extent that I'm buying one to rent out - I just was a little bummed at the lack of extras included for reservation holders. But, in my constantly contrarian brain, I DID get extras - the price (and feature set) has gone up a bit overall, and the effective price has gone up a bit from initial announcement to now - which isn't that big a shock in this market anyway. In an email exchange, somebody put it nicely in perspective, saying something like "OK, wisenheimer - would you rather have the 3.5" flipout LCD and the small internal consumer style battery for your Red One? Or would you rather pay a bit more for a much bigger & higher res screen and a bigger and better battery?" Well, yeah - I probably would.
But in looking back, they DID "optionize" just about everything they could in order to hold the price point.
Other Red Stuff of Interest: I've been catching up on Reduser.net posts
WEIGHT: current dev builds way nearly 9 pounds for just the camera, they are going to try to slim it from there. Eek - that's a more than 25% increase from the original 7 pound estimate.
RGB RECORDING DELAY: no RGB recording mode for a couple of months or so
SHIPPING SCHEDULE: startup production quantities lower than anticipated, but should still ship all cameras by Sept/Oct, timetable for serial number release schedule at NAB
Evin Grant guessing about 1080p24 RGB data rates: (which may be based on my own guesses I'd previously posted here, which are known to be a bit off on the RGB stuff)
A good guess would be about 18.15MBs or 1.06GB per minute at 24FPS.
So from that wou can figure...
RedDrive- 320GB (296GB Formated)= 278 minutes
Red Ram- 64GB= 60 minutes
Red Flash 8GB CF card= 7 Min 31 Sec
Red Flash 32GB onboard= 30 minutes
READER COMMENTS ON PRICE CHANGES: Reduser.net poster Andrew put it well: "Hey, in a few month investment of $1000 did bring you the return of $2,500.
250% gain, with 110% money back guarantee, I didn’t see this one since a long time."
Steve Gibby of Cut4 framed it from the pro's perspective:: "I think the ones who have complained about the RED prices are invariably those who are moving up from the prosumer world of production. They're used to prosumer price levels and they now have sticker shock at what a professional camera system costs. Ironically, the longtime professionals who know what pro-level camera systems cost, are stoked with RED prices because they know the RED prices are way below the norm for pro level gear.
...
The end result since NAB 2006: the price to performance ratio of the RED One camera system has become even more dynamic, with many added features, and a slight increase in price.
...
If you’re moving up from the prosumer world count yourself lucky to now have tools available to you, at a stunning price/performance ratio, that all of us longtime pros have been dreaming about for our entire careers."
...and that nails it pretty damn well.
Jim Jannard's comment on price changes:: "Again... the original LCD was a flip-out 3.5' and the battery was a proprietary RED on-camera type like an HVX. They now are professional grade. A 5.6' hi-rez LCD and a V-lock battery (open) system. If these were offered as a $400 upgrade, everyone would have wanted them. Or should have wanted them.
Jim"
As for battery prices, another commenter said: "I have purchased at least 10 high end broadcast cameras from Panasonic, Sony, and Ikegami over the years - and not one of them came with a battery!" ...so there you go.
=====
Semi off topic, as for digital cinema from NYTimes:
"there are now 2,300 screens across the country with digital projectors, still a small fraction of the nation’s 37,000. The higher-quality equipment is not expected to be widely installed until 2009, when a few high-profile movies in 3D requiring digital projection (like James Cameron’s “Avatar”) are scheduled for release."
that ties into 4K finishing - nice if you can do it, certainly not necessary for all projects, not even theatrical ones. If you have toolset and/or budget to do it and want it for future usage, great.
=====
On ordering a camera at NAB:: "You can place an order at NAB with a fully refundable deposit." according to Jim Jannard.
======
On the resolution of the LCD: "the LCD is WSVGA. -Jim" - that's 1024x600, not the 720p I'd previously erroneously reported. Oops, sorry about that.
======
Rods and standards and spacing: Reduser.net - View Single Post - Rod size clarification: "We will not support Panavision standards... but will support Arri standards. An elite rental house in Holloywood has come by several times with equipment to make sure we conform to accessories already in the field. Remember that our system is modular... if we have screwed up somewhere or forgotten something, we will fix it or add it.
Jim"
========
On Workflow: Red One Pipeline Diagram v1.0 - Page 14 - Reduser.net - Michael Morlan's excellent chart he keeps updating
======
Latest rendering of Red One with all accessories: Battleship... - Reduser.net - fully up to date render
-------
Battery myths - Reduser.net - battery advice
=========
Pricing mistake... - Reduser.net: "Oops... we made a pricing mistake.
The charger is only $550 (not $750) and the Power Kit is $1450 (not $1650).
In our haste to post prices, we made an error. Our apologies. Changes to our website will be made shortly.
Jim"
....and that's the kind of mistake I'll take any day...
before we start, here's my first impressions from the other day with more details on the new accessories)
I'm happy with how low the prices are on all the Red accessories - as professional level gear, this stuff is VERY inexpensive.
There's even been an improvement - the battery charger is only $550, not $750 - Jim says it was a pricing mistake. Post-announcement correction, misquoted price, "whatevs" - a welcome change.
UPDATE - but then the Red Arm & extension cables were removed from the LCD - compare the original (Google cached) to the current one. So that's a further $375 reduction in value to the customer. The specs do keep changing.
I originally misunderstood the purpose of the CF Flash module - I thought it was for settings and stills, pulled out and made optional. But that's the SD module, not the CF module, and the SD module IS included with the camera. That, on top of the lack of included battery, LCD, and what I understood to be Red Flash made me think that the price point was held by stripping off parts and making them cost added options, and that made me cranky.
I was then further dissapointed that the "extra love" we'd been hearing noises about was basically just going to get us back to where our expectations started.
I think this boils down to the following good news/bad news scenario:
GOOD NEWS: The camera is everything promised, and more. You get 4K compressed recording onboard, which didn't exist when the original $17.5K price point was announced. As for Red Flash, there's now three kinds, take your pick. You get get your Redcine for free, for now an open license for your own use on as many machines as you want. Instead of a 3.5" flip-out LCD, you get a 5.6" 1024x600 one that can mount anywhere on the camera. Instead of a small embedded/internal battery, you get a full size professional one. As a reservation holder, you get a $2500 credit to pick the accessories of your choice.
BAD NEWS: Battery not included (but is bigger/better than originally planned). LCD not included (but again, bigger/better than originally planned). Red Flash module not included (but there's three or four to choose from). That $2500 roughly catches you up to where you thought you were starting - so instead of a bonus prize, you get what you thought you were already getting. Flippantly, let me say its exciting in the same way a tax refund is - "Hooray! I got my own...money..back. Hmm."
In retrospect, it is a little more complicated than "So did we get the camera promised at the same price point or didn't we?" - I think the exact answer is now "You get more camera than was originally proposed at that $17,500 price point, with more features and better options than originally proposed. But it is taking a little longer, early units will not be feature complete for a few months yet, and the price has effectively gone up a bit. BUT, if you're a reservation holder, you're going to pretty much get what you expected for the same size check."
I think the discrepancy arose when we'd expected camera/battery/LCD and THEN some extra goodies on top of that for being reservation holders. Instead, we got camera/battery/LCD. I'd mentally incorporated all the improvements in features and expected the price point to remain exactly the same.
It has taken some time to digest all this news and come up with a cogent analysis.
I still love the camera and think it is Sliced Bread 2.0 as far as cameras go in terms of what I'd want, delivering far more features than I could expect from any other company at this price point - to the extent that I'm buying one to rent out - I just was a little bummed at the lack of extras included for reservation holders. But, in my constantly contrarian brain, I DID get extras - the price (and feature set) has gone up a bit overall, and the effective price has gone up a bit from initial announcement to now - which isn't that big a shock in this market anyway. In an email exchange, somebody put it nicely in perspective, saying something like "OK, wisenheimer - would you rather have the 3.5" flipout LCD and the small internal consumer style battery for your Red One? Or would you rather pay a bit more for a much bigger & higher res screen and a bigger and better battery?" Well, yeah - I probably would.
But in looking back, they DID "optionize" just about everything they could in order to hold the price point.
Other Red Stuff of Interest: I've been catching up on Reduser.net posts
WEIGHT: current dev builds way nearly 9 pounds for just the camera, they are going to try to slim it from there. Eek - that's a more than 25% increase from the original 7 pound estimate.
RGB RECORDING DELAY: no RGB recording mode for a couple of months or so
SHIPPING SCHEDULE: startup production quantities lower than anticipated, but should still ship all cameras by Sept/Oct, timetable for serial number release schedule at NAB
Evin Grant guessing about 1080p24 RGB data rates: (which may be based on my own guesses I'd previously posted here, which are known to be a bit off on the RGB stuff)
A good guess would be about 18.15MBs or 1.06GB per minute at 24FPS.
So from that wou can figure...
RedDrive- 320GB (296GB Formated)= 278 minutes
Red Ram- 64GB= 60 minutes
Red Flash 8GB CF card= 7 Min 31 Sec
Red Flash 32GB onboard= 30 minutes
READER COMMENTS ON PRICE CHANGES: Reduser.net poster Andrew put it well: "Hey, in a few month investment of $1000 did bring you the return of $2,500.
250% gain, with 110% money back guarantee, I didn’t see this one since a long time."
Steve Gibby of Cut4 framed it from the pro's perspective:: "I think the ones who have complained about the RED prices are invariably those who are moving up from the prosumer world of production. They're used to prosumer price levels and they now have sticker shock at what a professional camera system costs. Ironically, the longtime professionals who know what pro-level camera systems cost, are stoked with RED prices because they know the RED prices are way below the norm for pro level gear.
...
The end result since NAB 2006: the price to performance ratio of the RED One camera system has become even more dynamic, with many added features, and a slight increase in price.
...
If you’re moving up from the prosumer world count yourself lucky to now have tools available to you, at a stunning price/performance ratio, that all of us longtime pros have been dreaming about for our entire careers."
...and that nails it pretty damn well.
Jim Jannard's comment on price changes:: "Again... the original LCD was a flip-out 3.5' and the battery was a proprietary RED on-camera type like an HVX. They now are professional grade. A 5.6' hi-rez LCD and a V-lock battery (open) system. If these were offered as a $400 upgrade, everyone would have wanted them. Or should have wanted them.
Jim"
As for battery prices, another commenter said: "I have purchased at least 10 high end broadcast cameras from Panasonic, Sony, and Ikegami over the years - and not one of them came with a battery!" ...so there you go.
=====
Semi off topic, as for digital cinema from NYTimes:
"there are now 2,300 screens across the country with digital projectors, still a small fraction of the nation’s 37,000. The higher-quality equipment is not expected to be widely installed until 2009, when a few high-profile movies in 3D requiring digital projection (like James Cameron’s “Avatar”) are scheduled for release."
that ties into 4K finishing - nice if you can do it, certainly not necessary for all projects, not even theatrical ones. If you have toolset and/or budget to do it and want it for future usage, great.
=====
On ordering a camera at NAB:: "You can place an order at NAB with a fully refundable deposit." according to Jim Jannard.
======
On the resolution of the LCD: "the LCD is WSVGA. -Jim" - that's 1024x600, not the 720p I'd previously erroneously reported. Oops, sorry about that.
======
Rods and standards and spacing: Reduser.net - View Single Post - Rod size clarification: "We will not support Panavision standards... but will support Arri standards. An elite rental house in Holloywood has come by several times with equipment to make sure we conform to accessories already in the field. Remember that our system is modular... if we have screwed up somewhere or forgotten something, we will fix it or add it.
Jim"
========
On Workflow: Red One Pipeline Diagram v1.0 - Page 14 - Reduser.net - Michael Morlan's excellent chart he keeps updating
======
Latest rendering of Red One with all accessories: Battleship... - Reduser.net - fully up to date render
-------
Battery myths - Reduser.net - battery advice
=========
Pricing mistake... - Reduser.net: "Oops... we made a pricing mistake.
The charger is only $550 (not $750) and the Power Kit is $1450 (not $1650).
In our haste to post prices, we made an error. Our apologies. Changes to our website will be made shortly.
Jim"
....and that's the kind of mistake I'll take any day...
Labels: Red
Comments:
The guess of 18.15MBs is a little too low for decent wavelet compression. For YUV 4:2:2 that will be decent. In our recent dual link Viper shoot, RGB 1080p24 averaged around 40+MB/s. That is also wavelet compressed. I would hope the RGB data rates use a high as the recording mechanism allows -- or you get rate control options to set it that way.
Just saw the change in the LCD/Red Arm details and have to say RIP OFF!
You're seriously telling me that if I buy the LCD then I have no way to attach it to my camera without having to buy another piece of kit?
Stop messing us around Red - if you've messed up then just say so and increase the price of the LCD WITH the arm included, rather than pretending its staying at the same price whilst suddenly charging extra for the ability to actually use it!
That's completely ridiculous.
You're seriously telling me that if I buy the LCD then I have no way to attach it to my camera without having to buy another piece of kit?
Stop messing us around Red - if you've messed up then just say so and increase the price of the LCD WITH the arm included, rather than pretending its staying at the same price whilst suddenly charging extra for the ability to actually use it!
That's completely ridiculous.
I think your math is all wrong. if most cams don't come with a battery at least they come with a way to shoulder mount the thing and also come with a way to mount the batt. Both extra costs on the RED Lets look at the numbers.
$17.5k for cam
$1,250 for shoulder mount/batt mount
$1,459 battey and charger
$1700 for viewing the cheapest way
$900 for capturing the cheapest way
$22,809 - Thats minimum cost to make it work in a way other cams work
minus the $2500 only for reservation holders
Total:$20,309
And now you do not get the cables for the lcd that were included when the prices were originally posted
And if you want a flash option that was originally included thats an extra $500
So its defintitely bumped up considerably in price and man you will need the evf and the longer lcd cables and flash and a lens and we are well on our way to the bigger numbers when you can get good HD cams coming out with easier workflows and auto features that are cheaper than RED.
$17.5k for cam
$1,250 for shoulder mount/batt mount
$1,459 battey and charger
$1700 for viewing the cheapest way
$900 for capturing the cheapest way
$22,809 - Thats minimum cost to make it work in a way other cams work
minus the $2500 only for reservation holders
Total:$20,309
And now you do not get the cables for the lcd that were included when the prices were originally posted
And if you want a flash option that was originally included thats an extra $500
So its defintitely bumped up considerably in price and man you will need the evf and the longer lcd cables and flash and a lens and we are well on our way to the bigger numbers when you can get good HD cams coming out with easier workflows and auto features that are cheaper than RED.
There is a short cable with connector that comes with the lcd to attach to cam. You are just not getting the 3ft and 10ft cable and arm to attach which is another $175 you forgot to include in the price.
Whats really funny is a major announcement was made regarding the lowering of the battery price but when the lcd options changed -silence for a while until the Red faithful started the lynching process and Jannard came on saying- we're going dark until NAB
Prices might be lower or prices might be higher.
Jim jannard - give the basic production pack, the power pack , the flash module, the lcd FREE to those with reservations.The faithful remeber? You can definitely afford it for those 1450 plus holders.
Whats really funny is a major announcement was made regarding the lowering of the battery price but when the lcd options changed -silence for a while until the Red faithful started the lynching process and Jannard came on saying- we're going dark until NAB
Prices might be lower or prices might be higher.
Jim jannard - give the basic production pack, the power pack , the flash module, the lcd FREE to those with reservations.The faithful remeber? You can definitely afford it for those 1450 plus holders.
I agree Jim Jannard should give those things for free instead of the allowance. I mean its been over a year where the faithful kept posting ideas, helped the process along, and most importantly helped the marketing of the cam grow and stay alive. And for over a years worth of that work all you get is $2,500.
Those be slave wages sir. I guess thats that how you get to be a billionaire.
Those be slave wages sir. I guess thats that how you get to be a billionaire.
Jim and the Red team are heroes.
Those who quibble about 1-2 thousand price differences are not businessmen. Red has given more
than expected. They are about to blow out the Japanese complacent companies of the last six years. Red is part of an empowering movement for the indie filmmaker and videographer. Jim Jannard has acted both ethically and decently. All those who think otherwise should buy a competitive product and shut-up.
Those who quibble about 1-2 thousand price differences are not businessmen. Red has given more
than expected. They are about to blow out the Japanese complacent companies of the last six years. Red is part of an empowering movement for the indie filmmaker and videographer. Jim Jannard has acted both ethically and decently. All those who think otherwise should buy a competitive product and shut-up.
Dude using the word hero fo a camera maker is pathetic and a disgrace to real heroes. Look up the word or try and find out what a real hero is. And telling people to shut up without posting a name is flat out chicken sh++
i guess it all depends on what directions one took to get to the RED store ..
if you took the DV/pro consumer route then RED must look expensive ... if you took the film/digibeta/cineAlta route it looks cheap ... and those in between it must look resonable..
so lets say RED wasn't around - what camera are you going to BUY with your 20-25K and how much rebate are they giving you back... how much are those P2 cards ?
price a panasonic HD 900 and now add accessories - so why don't we see complaints about panasonic/sony prices ??
guessing because you don't have a individual NAME & they aren't listening ... here you know the NAME and you know that person is listening .... much more difficult to talk to a corporation
why the mention of billionaire ... how much you think sony/panasonic takes in? how much PROFIT do they pay out to share holders? p2 cards = big PROFIT and you have nobody else to buy p2 from ?
perhaps somebody that buys the EVF that comes with a arm doesn't want another arm if they decide to also buy the LCD ??? others may want both arms ... so there is al la carte at the store ...
if you took the DV/pro consumer route then RED must look expensive ... if you took the film/digibeta/cineAlta route it looks cheap ... and those in between it must look resonable..
so lets say RED wasn't around - what camera are you going to BUY with your 20-25K and how much rebate are they giving you back... how much are those P2 cards ?
price a panasonic HD 900 and now add accessories - so why don't we see complaints about panasonic/sony prices ??
guessing because you don't have a individual NAME & they aren't listening ... here you know the NAME and you know that person is listening .... much more difficult to talk to a corporation
why the mention of billionaire ... how much you think sony/panasonic takes in? how much PROFIT do they pay out to share holders? p2 cards = big PROFIT and you have nobody else to buy p2 from ?
perhaps somebody that buys the EVF that comes with a arm doesn't want another arm if they decide to also buy the LCD ??? others may want both arms ... so there is al la carte at the store ...
Using the word "Heroe" for Jim Jannard is not entirely inappropriate. A heroe in your life is someone who inspires you on some level. Like Bruce Lee or a great teacher. Jim went out on a limb and could've failed easily, especially within the timeframe.
I looked up a definition of "Heroe" and I think Jim
fits: "a person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding
achievements, or noble qualities".
I looked up a definition of "Heroe" and I think Jim
fits: "a person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding
achievements, or noble qualities".
I can tell you're very immature because you explantion of hero is sophmoric and ridiculous.
Maybe you should first learn to spell hero properly then you can learn the real meaning of the word by actually getting out into the world instead of making false idols and fetishizing a piece of metal.
Maybe you should first learn to spell hero properly then you can learn the real meaning of the word by actually getting out into the world instead of making false idols and fetishizing a piece of metal.
I tink the a billionare like Jannard is no where near going out on limb.
Billionare and going out on a limb making a camera?
Hysterical
Billionare and going out on a limb making a camera?
Hysterical
Excuse my French (heroe). O.K. "HERO" is the spelling. Calling me sophomoric and generalizing my maturity over my usage of the above is narrow minded on your part.
Sure he's a billionaire on paper or whatever. I guess you'd like his story more if he were poor to start.
Rich people are complacent, by and large, once they make their money they just want to protect it.
Lots of them will then buy other businesses to keep the cash flow. Not many of them can start with an idea and see it through in record time.
That's inspiring.
Jim didn't need Red. He saw "Red" as a camera buff, and was determined to tear down the walls of the vested interests and prove he could do better. Sweet.
As for your diatribe about "false idols, for your information I am an atheist and very proud of it.
Sure he's a billionaire on paper or whatever. I guess you'd like his story more if he were poor to start.
Rich people are complacent, by and large, once they make their money they just want to protect it.
Lots of them will then buy other businesses to keep the cash flow. Not many of them can start with an idea and see it through in record time.
That's inspiring.
Jim didn't need Red. He saw "Red" as a camera buff, and was determined to tear down the walls of the vested interests and prove he could do better. Sweet.
As for your diatribe about "false idols, for your information I am an atheist and very proud of it.
wow we have something in common. I'm an atheist too.
I didn't call you sophmoric I called your explanation of hero as sophmoric. Proves my point that you're immature. Actually you're getting younger the more you write
maybe your atheisim has caused a lack of spiritual identity so you've latched on to a piece of metal that shoots video images. You see it as a "holy grail" and the fighter of all those "vested interests" that for some reason hasn't given you what you wanted. Which I'd like to know why as there are many cams out there that can make indie film. I mean people are still using the pd-150 to make films and getting them in theaters.
Its the story pal. Always will be. Spending more cash on better tech is just spending cash on better tech nothing else.
I stand by the billionaire thing. All the tech has been out there. he invented nothing knew. Even redcode is a cineform like compression program. His money has just given him the ability to tweak and do it better. His oakely factory has the ability to be quickly tooled to machine the cam. A luxury many others haven't had.
There is nothing new to what he's done. He's just had the financial resources to do it. I would say the that one factor is the most crucial aspect of any endeavor and its got nothing to do with the word hero.
The word revolutionary was first used by Jannard. Never in the history of the word has it been defined by the person who says its revolutionary. It will be up to the people to decide. I guess the only thing revolutionary is the fact a billionaire for the first time in history decided to spend his time making a video camera. Unlike losers like Bill Gates who just the other day donated $125.000,000 of his money on education. That would be closer to hero for me and I hate pc's I'm a mac guy.
I didn't call you sophmoric I called your explanation of hero as sophmoric. Proves my point that you're immature. Actually you're getting younger the more you write
maybe your atheisim has caused a lack of spiritual identity so you've latched on to a piece of metal that shoots video images. You see it as a "holy grail" and the fighter of all those "vested interests" that for some reason hasn't given you what you wanted. Which I'd like to know why as there are many cams out there that can make indie film. I mean people are still using the pd-150 to make films and getting them in theaters.
Its the story pal. Always will be. Spending more cash on better tech is just spending cash on better tech nothing else.
I stand by the billionaire thing. All the tech has been out there. he invented nothing knew. Even redcode is a cineform like compression program. His money has just given him the ability to tweak and do it better. His oakely factory has the ability to be quickly tooled to machine the cam. A luxury many others haven't had.
There is nothing new to what he's done. He's just had the financial resources to do it. I would say the that one factor is the most crucial aspect of any endeavor and its got nothing to do with the word hero.
The word revolutionary was first used by Jannard. Never in the history of the word has it been defined by the person who says its revolutionary. It will be up to the people to decide. I guess the only thing revolutionary is the fact a billionaire for the first time in history decided to spend his time making a video camera. Unlike losers like Bill Gates who just the other day donated $125.000,000 of his money on education. That would be closer to hero for me and I hate pc's I'm a mac guy.
wow we have something in common. I'm an atheist too.
I didn't call you sophmoric I called your explanation of hero as sophmoric. Proves my point that you're immature. Actually you're getting younger the more you write
maybe your atheisim has caused a lack of spiritual identity so you've latched on to a piece of metal that shoots video images. You see it as a "holy grail" and the fighter of all those "vested interests" that for some reason hasn't given you what you wanted. Which I'd like to know why as there are many cams out there that can make indie film. I mean people are still using the pd-150 to make films and getting them in theaters.
Its the story pal. Always will be. Spending more cash on better tech is just spending cash on better tech nothing else.
I stand by the billionaire thing. All the tech has been out there. he invented nothing knew. Even redcode is a cineform like compression program. His money has just given him the ability to tweak and do it better. His oakely factory has the ability to be quickly tooled to machine the cam. A luxury many others haven't had.
There is nothing new to what he's done. He's just had the financial resources to do it. I would say the that one factor is the most crucial aspect of any endeavor and its got nothing to do with the word hero.
The word revolutionary was first used by Jannard. Never in the history of the word has it been defined by the person who says its revolutionary. It will be up to the people to decide. I guess the only thing revolutionary is the fact a billionaire for the first time in history decided to spend his time making a video camera. Unlike losers like Bill Gates who just the other day donated $125.000,000 of his money on education. That would be closer to hero for me and I hate pc's I'm a mac guy.
Post a Comment
I didn't call you sophmoric I called your explanation of hero as sophmoric. Proves my point that you're immature. Actually you're getting younger the more you write
maybe your atheisim has caused a lack of spiritual identity so you've latched on to a piece of metal that shoots video images. You see it as a "holy grail" and the fighter of all those "vested interests" that for some reason hasn't given you what you wanted. Which I'd like to know why as there are many cams out there that can make indie film. I mean people are still using the pd-150 to make films and getting them in theaters.
Its the story pal. Always will be. Spending more cash on better tech is just spending cash on better tech nothing else.
I stand by the billionaire thing. All the tech has been out there. he invented nothing knew. Even redcode is a cineform like compression program. His money has just given him the ability to tweak and do it better. His oakely factory has the ability to be quickly tooled to machine the cam. A luxury many others haven't had.
There is nothing new to what he's done. He's just had the financial resources to do it. I would say the that one factor is the most crucial aspect of any endeavor and its got nothing to do with the word hero.
The word revolutionary was first used by Jannard. Never in the history of the word has it been defined by the person who says its revolutionary. It will be up to the people to decide. I guess the only thing revolutionary is the fact a billionaire for the first time in history decided to spend his time making a video camera. Unlike losers like Bill Gates who just the other day donated $125.000,000 of his money on education. That would be closer to hero for me and I hate pc's I'm a mac guy.
Links to this post:

