Atom Feed
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
RSS Feed
Buy Mike Recommended
edit systems & gear
from Silverado Systems
Buy Books, Software, & More
at HD for Indies Amazon Store
Buy New Movies from
HD for Indies Amazon Store
Or, you can also support
HD4NDs by contributing
to the tip jar...
Help Support HD for Indies
Advertisements
Great HD Links
- HD For Indies Home Page
- HD For Indies FAQ
- HD 24
- Cinematography
- Bare Feats
- 24p Entertainment
- Digital Praxis
- OneRiver Codec Resource
- CamcorderInfo.com
- LumiereHD
- HighDef.org Info
- Understanding RAID
- Video Systems (Reviews)
- DV Film (DV=>Film)
- SonyHDVInfo.com
- Plus 8 Digital (vendor)
- Digital Cinema Society
- Texas High Def (local F900 guy)
- Creative Cow (news & forums)
- Philadelphia FCP User Group
- Los Angeles FCP User Group
- Cinema Tech
- FresHDV
- DV Info's forums
- HVX User
- Pro App Tips
- Bluesky Media - Instruction
- RedUser.net
- fxguide
- little frog in high def
- VideoMaker Learning Section
- Stu Maschwitz's ProLost
Archives
- March 2004
- April 2004
- May 2004
- June 2004
- July 2004
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
High Definition Video for Independent Filmmakers
A How To Guide for Digital Filmmakers
Welcome all! This is my blog to share my latest research,
thoughts, etc. on utilizing HD for independent filmmaking.
YES, I am available for consulting
Contact me at mike@hdforindies.com
All content copyright 2004-2007 Mike Curtis.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
First stab at comparing DNxHD and ProRes
Studio Daily Blog � The great codec bake-off
I wouldn't call it that (the great codec bake-off), since it is just a first step, and I have a lot of technical quibbles (see my comment, and Graeme's next in the article) - so don't let the headline throw you - I think it is of interest to compare the two, but the results as shown are not what I would consider final nor unequivocal.
I'd like to see the One River Codec test image used to compare them, use some real footage (DCI StEM, anybody?), test/experiment with the 4:4:4 chroma filtering option, etc.
-mike
UPDATE - he redid some tests, and the results make ProRes look better, but it isn't clear if his currently posted images are the new-and-improved, or the old-n-busted. I'm still going to fool with it on my own when I get a chance.
Just got off the phone with a client asking about whether ProRes obviates the need for a RAID for HD work...good question, I don't have a definitive answer yet. Let's presume it falls between the quality of DVCPRO HD and uncompressed (a pretty reasonable presumption) - therefore for SOME amount of the market it will be good enough for their needs - the real question is how much of that market - and I don't know the answer to that yet, I need to do my own testing now that I'm back in town.
At this point, while he's said he retested, I'm not sure whether the posted files are the original testing methodology or the second improved-but-still-potentially-have-issues testing methodogy - so while his intent may have been to have a conversation starter on codec quality, I don't consider his downloadable files & samples worth seriously evaluating in depth until his testing methodology is clearly documented, updated results posted, etc.
Otherwise, his post is merely a conversation starter as he states but his headline implies otherwise, and his presented data lacks relevance to the core question at hand. To me, the core issue is how good are these codecs in their "native" environments first (Final Cut for ProRes, Avid for DNxHD), and a secondary but still interesting question is how good are these codecs for intermediate files rendered out of After Effects. Methodology is crucial in these regards.
-mike
I wouldn't call it that (the great codec bake-off), since it is just a first step, and I have a lot of technical quibbles (see my comment, and Graeme's next in the article) - so don't let the headline throw you - I think it is of interest to compare the two, but the results as shown are not what I would consider final nor unequivocal.
I'd like to see the One River Codec test image used to compare them, use some real footage (DCI StEM, anybody?), test/experiment with the 4:4:4 chroma filtering option, etc.
-mike
UPDATE - he redid some tests, and the results make ProRes look better, but it isn't clear if his currently posted images are the new-and-improved, or the old-n-busted. I'm still going to fool with it on my own when I get a chance.
Just got off the phone with a client asking about whether ProRes obviates the need for a RAID for HD work...good question, I don't have a definitive answer yet. Let's presume it falls between the quality of DVCPRO HD and uncompressed (a pretty reasonable presumption) - therefore for SOME amount of the market it will be good enough for their needs - the real question is how much of that market - and I don't know the answer to that yet, I need to do my own testing now that I'm back in town.
At this point, while he's said he retested, I'm not sure whether the posted files are the original testing methodology or the second improved-but-still-potentially-have-issues testing methodogy - so while his intent may have been to have a conversation starter on codec quality, I don't consider his downloadable files & samples worth seriously evaluating in depth until his testing methodology is clearly documented, updated results posted, etc.
Otherwise, his post is merely a conversation starter as he states but his headline implies otherwise, and his presented data lacks relevance to the core question at hand. To me, the core issue is how good are these codecs in their "native" environments first (Final Cut for ProRes, Avid for DNxHD), and a secondary but still interesting question is how good are these codecs for intermediate files rendered out of After Effects. Methodology is crucial in these regards.
-mike